Family Provision Claim NSW: Who Can Contest a Will and How It Works

Even a valid, properly signed, witnessed will can be challenged in NSW. And if an executor distributes the estate before this risk has been properly managed, they can be held personally liable for what was paid out. This is not a hypothetical — it is one of the most common sources of executor exposure in NSW estates.

A family provision claim is not an attack on whether the will is technically valid. It is a claim that the deceased failed in their moral obligation to provide adequately for the claimant. A court can rewrite the distribution — regardless of what the will says.

Who Can Make a Family Provision Claim

Part 3.2 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) sets out the eligible persons who can bring a claim:

• Spouse of the deceased (including de facto partners)
• Children of the deceased — including adult children, estranged children, and children who received nothing under the will
• Grandchildren, if their parent (the deceased's child) predeceased the testator
• Persons in a close personal relationship with the deceased at the time of death — this is a broader category that can include live-in carers and others with a close domestic connection

Former spouses can also be eligible in some circumstances, particularly where there is financial dependence.

Notably absent from this list: siblings, parents, friends, and remote relatives — unless they fall into the "close personal relationship" category, which requires significant evidence of the nature of the relationship.

The Test Courts Apply

Making a claim does not automatically succeed. The court must be satisfied that the deceased had a moral duty to make adequate provision for the claimant and that the will (or intestacy rules, if there is no will) failed to do so.

Factors the court considers include:

• The nature and duration of the relationship
• What the claimant contributed to the deceased's welfare or estate (unpaid care, financial contributions)
• The claimant's current financial position and needs
• What the claimant received during the deceased's lifetime (gifts, financial support)
• The size of the estate and the needs of other beneficiaries
• Whether the claimant was maintained by the deceased

An adult child who is wealthy, healthy, and estranged from the deceased for 30 years with good reason will face a harder argument than a dependent child with no income, significant medical needs, and a history of active involvement in the deceased's care.

The 12-Month Deadline

Claims must be lodged within 12 months of the date of death. This is a hard deadline under the Succession Act 2006. Extensions are available but courts grant them reluctantly and only in genuine exceptional circumstances — illness, lack of knowledge about the estate, or a claimant who was outside the country with limited access to legal advice.

If you are an executor, the 12-month window runs from the date of death, not from probate. It is a common misunderstanding that the clock starts from the grant.

If you are administering an NSW estate and want a structured guide to executor duties, probate, and safe distribution timing, the Estate Settlement Guide for New South Wales lays out every step with the right sequence.

Contesting a Will vs Challenging Its Validity

These are different things and often confused.

Contesting a will via a family provision claim accepts that the will is valid — it just argues the distribution is inadequate for the claimant.

Challenging the validity of a will argues the will should not be recognised at all. Grounds include:

• Lack of testamentary capacity (the deceased did not understand what they were signing)
• Undue influence (the deceased was pressured or manipulated)
• Fraud or forgery
• Failure to comply with execution requirements

A validity challenge must also be brought promptly — and it uses different processes through the Supreme Court. An executor who suspects a validity challenge should not distribute until the issue is resolved.

How an Executor Should Protect Themselves

An executor who distributes the estate without properly managing family provision claim risk faces personal liability. If the estate has already been paid out to beneficiaries and a successful claimant needs to be compensated, the executor may have to make up the shortfall from their own pocket.

The protection steps are:

Wait out the 12-month window. Do not distribute anything from the estate until 12 months from the date of death has passed, unless there are extremely good reasons to do so earlier (and you have taken legal advice on those reasons).

Publish a Notice of Intended Distribution. This is published through the NSW Online Registry (onlineregistry.lawlink.nsw.gov.au). After publishing, you must wait at least 30 days before distributing. This step is separate from the 12-month family provision window — you need both protections.

Take specific legal advice if claims are threatened. If a family member signals they are considering a claim, or sends a letter of demand, stop all distribution and get legal advice. Do not make any distribution to other beneficiaries in the interim.

Get indemnities from beneficiaries if you do decide to distribute before 12 months — but understand that an indemnity only helps if the beneficiary has the means to repay if a claim succeeds.

Mediation vs Court: How Claims Actually Resolve

The overwhelming majority of family provision claims in NSW settle at mediation before trial. The Supreme Court actively encourages this and can order parties to mediate.

Mediation is usually more efficient than a trial and carries less uncertainty. Both sides face legal costs and the risk of an unfavourable outcome at trial. A negotiated settlement — where the claimant receives something, beneficiaries keep something, and legal fees are minimised — is often the practical outcome.

What a successful court outcome looks like: the court does not void the will. It orders a specific provision from the estate be made to the claimant. That provision can take the form of a lump sum, an interest in property, or a right to reside. The court varies the distribution to make the provision — the will is not thrown out, but its effect is altered.

Small Estates and Proportionality

A claim against a small estate may not be commercially worthwhile for anyone involved. Litigation costs in the Supreme Court are significant. Where an estate has modest net assets, both sides face the possibility of legal costs consuming the entire dispute.

The court has powers to deal with small estate claims summarily and to manage costs proportionately, but the reality is that a family provision claim against a $50,000 estate is rarely worth pursuing through full litigation. Most small-estate disputes either settle informally or are not pursued.

What Executors Miss

Two executor behaviours cause most of the problems in this area:

Distributing too early. An executor who pays out beneficiaries within the first year of death — even with good intentions — is exposed if a claim is later brought. The estate is gone; the executor is the target.

Ignoring warning signs. A family member who expressed upset at the will reading, a former spouse asking questions about the estate's value, an estranged child who has contacted a solicitor — these are warning signs. Treating them as background noise and continuing to distribute is a significant risk.

If you are in the middle of administering an NSW estate and managing the window between death and safe distribution, the Estate Settlement Guide for New South Wales covers the executor's obligations in this period in full detail.

See more New South Wales guides →