When Does a Power of Attorney Start in the ACT? Springing vs Immediate
One of the first decisions when setting up an enduring power of attorney in the ACT is when the attorney's authority actually kicks in. The Powers of Attorney Act 2006 gives the principal two distinct activation models, and they work differently depending on which category of power is being granted. Getting this wrong creates either a premature transfer of authority or a dangerous gap when the attorney can't act at the exact moment they're needed.
Property Powers: You Choose When They Start
For property (financial) matters, the principal has flexibility. An EPA can grant property powers that take effect:
- Immediately upon execution (once the attorney signs the acceptance)
- On a specific future date nominated in the document
- Upon a triggering event specified in the document, such as the principal's loss of capacity
Immediate activation is the most common choice. It lets the attorney manage bills, accounts, and financial affairs right away — useful when a parent is still capable but wants help with day-to-day banking, or when they're about to travel and need someone to handle transactions in their absence.
A principal who's uncomfortable with immediate activation can specify that property powers only commence when a registered medical practitioner certifies in writing that they've lost decision-making capacity. This is the "springing" model. The tradeoff is practical: when the emergency happens, the attorney must first obtain a medical certificate before they can access a single bank account or pay a single bill. That delay can stretch to days or weeks if the principal's GP isn't immediately available or if the medical assessment is contested.
Personal Care, Health Care, and Medical Research: Always Capacity-Triggered
For personal care, health care, and medical research decisions, there's no choice. The Powers of Attorney Act 2006 mandates that these powers can only take effect once the principal has lost decision-making capacity. A medical practitioner must formally certify the loss of capacity in writing.
This means a principal cannot delegate healthcare decisions to an attorney while they're still competent. The rationale is protective — a capable adult should make their own medical choices. But it also means the transition point depends entirely on a medical assessment, and families need to know in advance which doctor to contact and what the assessment process involves.
How Capacity Loss Is Assessed
The legal test for capacity under the Act requires that the person can understand, retain, weigh, and communicate information relevant to the decision at hand. Capacity is decision-specific — someone might lack capacity for complex financial transactions while retaining capacity for everyday personal choices.
In practice, the treating GP or a medical specialist (typically a geriatrician or psychiatrist) conducts the assessment. A neuropsychologist may provide supporting evidence, but the certification must be in writing from a registered medical practitioner and reference the specific EPA. Families sometimes assume a dementia diagnosis automatically constitutes a loss of capacity, but that's not the case. Early-stage dementia may leave capacity intact for many decisions. The medical assessment is about functional decision-making ability at the time of the assessment, not the diagnosis itself.
Free Download
Get the Australian Capital Territory — POA Quick-Start Checklist
Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.
Choosing the Right Activation Model
Immediate activation makes sense when:
- The principal trusts their chosen attorney completely
- They want seamless financial management without a gap
- The attorney may need to act quickly (e.g., the principal has a chronic condition that could deteriorate suddenly)
- The principal wants to be able to oversee how the attorney operates while they can still monitor transactions
Springing activation makes sense when:
- The principal wants to maintain sole control over their finances for as long as possible
- There's any family tension about who manages money
- The principal is younger and creating the EPA as a long-term safeguard rather than an immediate need
There's a middle option too. The principal can grant immediate property powers but include a clause requiring the attorney to consult them on transactions above a certain value while the principal retains capacity. This preserves oversight without creating an activation gap.
What Happens at the Transition Point
When a principal loses capacity and the EPA's property powers were already active, nothing changes operationally — the attorney continues managing finances as before. The only practical difference is that the attorney can no longer consult the principal about decisions.
When the EPA has springing property powers, the attorney must obtain the medical certificate, present it to each financial institution along with the EPA, and wait for each institution to process the change. Banks may take several days to verify the documents, during which bills and payments remain frozen.
For health care powers, the transition always requires the medical certificate. The attorney should present it to the treating hospital or aged care facility along with the original EPA. If the principal also has a Health Direction refusing specific treatments, the attorney and medical team must review both documents together to ensure there's no conflict.
Our Australian Capital Territory Power of Attorney Kit includes activation clause templates for both immediate and springing models, plus a capacity assessment guide for the medical practitioner appointment.
Get the ACT Power of Attorney Kit and set up the activation model that fits your family's situation.
Get Your Free Australian Capital Territory — POA Quick-Start Checklist
Download the Australian Capital Territory — POA Quick-Start Checklist — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.